In a follow-up to our stories on July 22nd (BREAKING NEWS: Crawford Running 1998 Ad With Inhofe Endorsement and Inhofe: Crawford Ad "Inappropriate"; "Not Endorsing Crawford"), the John Crawford for Insurance Commissioner campaign has clarified the events behind the running of the ad.
According to Crawford, the ad (which first run in his 1998 re-election campaign) was mistakenly run by Cox Communications. Crawford had delivered two commercials to Cox - one to be run, and the other (with the Inhofe endorsement) for them to look at filming a similar one (but without the Inhofe section). A Cox employee inadvertently uploaded the wrong ad, which ran on television for a few days. Cox told the Crawford campaign that "this was [an] unintentional, human error."
Since then, the Crawford campaign has pulled the ad both from the airwaves, and from YouTube. The ad with the Inhofe endorsement had been posted on his website as well, but it no longer is on the internet.
While this may be the case, it does not explain why the Crawford campaign knowingly placed the ad on YouTube and on his website. A Cox employee might have mistakenly aired the wrong commercial, but they could not have edited his website. In addition, the ad was re-worked to include a "paid for by" disclaimer reflecting his 2010 account, so some work had to have been done on the ad before running it, and I find it hard to believe that Cox did not ask for approval on the re-worked edition.
Monday, August 09, 2010
1 comment:
PLEASE INCLUDE YOUR NAME when commenting. Anonymous comments may be rejected if NOT accompanied by a name.
Comments are welcome, but remember - commenting on my blog is a privilege. Do not abuse that privilege, or your comment will be deleted.
Thank you for joining in the discussion at MuskogeePolitico.com! Your opinion is appreciated!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Top Blog List
-
-
-
Wednesday's Final Word9 hours ago
-
-
Election 2024 reactions1 week ago
-
Thank you for this clarification.
ReplyDeleteSo, while Cox Communications has claimed responsibility for running the ad on TV, what does Mr. Crawford have to say about putting the ad on his website AND You Tube?? He can't blame that on anyone but himself! (Of course, now he has removed all evidence!)
Besides, Sen. Inhofe's comments say he had to contact Mr. Crawford "on several occasions" about the "inappropriate use of a 12 year old endorsement".
JOHN DOAK gets my vote for Insurance Commissioner!
Ann O.